Brewers Take The Good With The Bad
By SARAH THEODORE
Consumers trade up to crafts and imports while
mainstream beers still look for opportunities
The U.S. beer industry experienced a slight decline in 2005, dropping
total shipments 0.1 percent, according to the Beer Institute. But while
general-market domestic beers continue to struggle, high-end products are
enjoying growth in the high single-digits. Import beer shipments grew 7.2
percent, and craft beer shipments were up 9 percent — and they
carried that momentum into the first part of this year.
“The micro/craft segment had its strongest month
of January in the past five years, and this is coming off of a record year
for them in 2005,” says Dan Wandel, vice president of Information
Resources Inc.’s beer, wine and spirits practice. “So when we
say the beer category is struggling, yes, overall it is struggling. But
there are certain segments, particularly those in the high end that are not
struggling and are actually thriving right now.”
Total industry shipments | ||
(1,000s of 31-gallon barrels) | ||
Domestic | 178,800 | -1.2% |
Imports | 25,566 | 7.2% |
Exports | 4,151 | 8.0% |
Source: The Beer Institute |
Through Feb. 19, 2005, IRI reports that retail dollar
sales in the overall beer category, which includes ciders and non-alcoholic
beers, is up 0.5 percent in supermarkets, drug stores and mass
merchandisers (FDM), excluding Wal-Mart; and
1.9 percent in convenience stores vs. the prior year. Imports and
micro/craft beers showed impressive gains through all channels, with
imports growing almost 8 percent in FDM channels and nearly 22 percent in
convenience stores. Micros/craft beers gained more than 9 percent in FDM
channels and almost 7 percent in convenience.
Beer sales by category | ||||||
Dollar sales | Market share | a|||||
Category | Dollar sales | % change VS. prior year | Market share | % change VS. prior year | ||
Channel: Food, drug and mass merchandise (excluding Wal-Mart) | ||||||
IMPORTS | $1,683,525,632 | 7.7 | 19.4 | 1.3 | ||
MICRO/CRAFT | $428,906,336 | 9.4 | 5.0 | 0.4 | ||
MALTERNATIVE/FLAVORED ALCOHOL BEVERAGES | $336,431,264 | (6.1) | 3.9 | (0.3) | ||
DOMESTIC PREMIUM | $4,014,843,392 | 1.4 | 46.4 | 0.4 | ||
DOMESTIC SUPER PREMIUM | $530,946,048 | (14.3) | 6.1 | (1.1) | ||
DOMESTIC SUB-PREMIUM | $1,488,742,272 | (3.3) | 17.2 | (0.7) | ||
DOMESTIC MALT LIQUOR | $60,605,344 | (8.1) | 0.7 | (0.1) | ||
NON-ALCOHOLIC | $96,268,056 | (4.7) | 1.1 | (0.1) | ||
CIDER | $17,744,946 | 3.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | ||
FDM CATEGORY TOTAL | $8,658,013,184 | 0.5 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
Channel: Total U.S. Convenience | ||||||
IMPORTS | $1,408,500,000 | 21.5 | 11.2 | 1.8 | ||
MICRO/CRAFT | $132,750,900 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 0.0 | ||
MALTERNATIVES/FLAVORED ALCOHOL BEVERAGES | $432,403,100 | (5.6) | 3.4 | (0.3) | ||
DOMESTIC PREMIUM | $7,313,043,000 | 2.9 | 57.9 | 0.6 | ||
DOMESTIC SPECIALTY | $461,216,900 | (14.5) | 3.7 | (0.7) | ||
DOMESTIC SUB PREMIUM-(Budget and Popular) | $2,433,831,000 | (5.4) | 19.3 | (1.5) | ||
MALT LIQUOR | $419,838,900 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.1 | ||
DOMESTIC NON-ALCOHOL | $19,731,050 | (15.2) | 0.2 | (0.0) | ||
CIDERS | $2,793,784 | 34.8 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
CONVENIENCE CATEGORY TOTAL | $12,621,310,000 | 1.9 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
Source: Information Resources Inc., Chicago; 52 weeks ending Feb. 19, 2006 |
Top domestic beers by brand | ||||
Dollar sales | Market share | |||
Category | Dollar sales | % change VS prior year | Market share | % change VS prior year |
Channel: Food, drug and mass merchandise (excluding Wal-Mart) | ||||
BUD LIGHT | $1,332,337,664 | (1.1) | 15.4 | (0.2) |
BUDWEISER | $798,877,824 | (8.1) | 9.2 | (0.9) |
MILLER LITE | $709,876,992 | 1.8 | 8.2 | 0.1 |
COORS LIGHT | $597,656,256 | 2.3 | 6.9 | 0.1 |
NATURAL LIGHT | $283,830,848 | (2.4) | 3.3 | (0.1) |
MICHELOB ULTRA LIGHT | $216,703,840 | (18.6) | 2.5 | (0.6) |
BUSCH LIGHT | $200,370,352 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 0.0 |
MILLER GENUINE DRAFT | $182,094,240 | (8.6) | 2.1 | (0.2) |
MILLER HIGH LIFE | $175,045,216 | (5.2) | 2.0 | (0.1) |
BUSCH | $170,648,000 | (4.4) | 2.0 | (0.1) |
FDM DOMESTIC TOTAL | $6,524,097,536 | (0.8) | 75.4 | (1.0) |
Channel: Total U.S. Convenience | ||||
BUD LIGHT | $3,058,373,000 | 2.2 | 24.2 | 0.1 |
BUDWEISER | $1,836,025,000 | (4.5) | 14.5 | (1.0) |
MILLER LITE | $889,248,500 | 2.4 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
COORS LIGHT | $792,121,700 | 3.3 | 6.3 | 0.1 |
NATURAL LIGHT | $584,294,000 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 0.1 |
BUSCH | $469,036,000 | (13.0) | 3.7 | (0.6) |
BUSCH LIGHT | $311,773,700 | (8.7) | 2.5 | (0.3) |
MILLER HIGH LIFE | $267,140,100 | (2.0) | 2.1 | (0.1) |
MICHELOB ULTRA | $200,291,100 | (10.1) | 1.6 | (0.2) |
BUDWEISER SELECT | $189,115,500 | 11,001.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
CONVENIENCE DOMESTIC TOTAL | $11,212,810,000 | (0.2) | 88.8 | (1.8) |
Source: Information Resources Inc., Chicago; 52 weeks ending Feb. 19, 2006 |
Although shipments were down, retail dollar sales also
improved for the domestic premium segment, which gained 1.4 percent vs. the
prior year in FDM channels and almost 3 percent in convenience stores.
Wandel attributes the discrepancies between the
segments’ performance to consumers’ willingness to trade up to
more expensive products and their desire for choice. “I think the
malternatives segment helped to promote choice among consumers because they
started trying out different flavors,” he says. “Naturally
those flavors led them to try different sorts of beverage alcohol drinks.
It also got them accustomed to paying a high price.”
But he says, the big brewers, Anheuser-Busch in
particular, have come out swinging this year. “They’ve got a
number of new specialty type brands coming out appealing to choice,”
Wandel says. “They’re looking at things that are not traditional beer offerings … They are
definitely at the forefront of a lot of new innovation.”
Anheuser-Busch recently added Singapore’s Tiger
Beer to its lineup to increase its position in the import market, and plans
to increase Tiger’s currently limited distribution to nationwide
exposure. The company also took over the Grolsch Lager business from United
States Brewing this spring, several months ahead of schedule in order to
get the brand in its system before the summer selling season. In addition,
A-B introduced Peels, a malt beverage made with juice to appeal to female
consumers. In a departure from its traditional big-budget, big media
advertising, the company sampled the beer at high-end department stores
such as Neiman Marcus and Nordstrom to hit Peels’ key demographic.
Other innovative A-B offerings include organic Wild
Hop and Stone Mill beers, Spring Heat Spice Wheat, and Drink Innovations
flavor shots, which are made to be mixed with beer so consumers can
customize flavors. The company also has been rumored to be working with
energy drink-maker Hansen’s Beverage Co., owner of the Monster brand,
to develop an alcohol/energy drink.
In an effort to promote the entire industry,
Anheuser-Busch partnered with the Beer Institute on a new non-branded
“Here’s to Beer” Web site and ad campaign that was
launched during the Super Bowl to promote the history and social aspects of
beer.
As for its more traditional products, A-B’s Bud
Light and Budweiser brands continue to lead the beer category, with nearly
25 percent combined market share in FDM channels and nearly 39 percent in
convenience stores, according to IRI. Both brands saw sales declines in
food, drug and mass during the past year, but Bud Light managed to grow 2.2
percent in convenience stores. Competitors
Miller Lite and Coors Light pulled off sales gains in both retail segments,
with Miller Lite picking up 1.8 percent sales gains in FDM channels and 2.4
percent in convenience, while Coors Light grew 2.3 percent in FDM and 3.3
percent in convenience.
Top imported beers by brand | |||||||||
Dollar sales | Market share | ||||||||
Category | Dollar sales | % change vs. prior year | Market share | % change vs. prior year | |||||
Channel: Food, drug and mass merchandise (excluding Wal-Mart) | |||||||||
CORONA EXTRA | $454,581,696 | 9.5 | 5.3 | 0.4 | |||||
HEINEKEN | $275,670,912 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 0.2 | |||||
CORONA LIGHT | $110,727,016 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | |||||
TECATE | $79,799,392 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 | |||||
LABATT BLUE | $50,740,548 | (4.4) | 0.6 | (0.0) | |||||
AMSTEL LIGHT | $48,223,916 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 0.0 | |||||
BECK’S | $44,973,092 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |||||
GUINNESS DRAUGHT | $42,869,760 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |||||
MODELO ESPECIAL | $42,027,120 | 45.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | |||||
NEWCASTLE BROWN ALE | $40,164,360 | 18.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | |||||
FDM IMPORT TOTAL | $1,683,525,632 | 7.7 | 19.4 | 1.3 | |||||
Channel: Total U.S. Convenience | |||||||||
CORONA EXTRA | $517,123,300 | 24.8 | 4.1 | 0.8 | |||||
HEINEKEN | $333,684,700 | 15.1 | 2.6 | 0.3 | |||||
MODELO ESPECIAL | $79,286,200 | 103.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | |||||
TECATE | $67,949,900 | 44.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | |||||
LABATT BLUE | $48,041,640 | (19.2) | 0.4 | (0.1) | |||||
CORONA LIGHT | $37,478,450 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | |||||
BECK’S | $32,510,100 | 32.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | |||||
FOSTER’S LAGER | $26,201,220 | (2.1) | 0.2 | (0.0)) | |||||
CORONITA EXTRA | $24,347,200 | 218.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |||||
LABATT BLUE LIGHT | $21,693,560 | (14.7) | 0.2 | (0.0) | |||||
CONVENIENCE IMPORT TOTAL | $1,408,500,000 | 21.5 | 11.2 | 1.8 | |||||
Source: Information Resources Inc., Chicago; 52 weeks ending Feb. 19, 2006 |
Miller Brewing Co. has taken a slightly different tack
to Anheuser-Busch’s innovation efforts to help boost sales. The
company has spent the past months revamping its brand images with
advertising that plays up the premium quality of its products. Indicating
that the beer industry has allowed its marketing to become too lowbrow,
Miller Chief Executive Officer Norman Adami recently told a group of beer
industry observers, “We believe the single biggest factor determining
the success or failure of each of our brands is the quality of the
marketing behind those brands.”
The company re-tagged its Miller Genuine Draft as
“Beer. Grown Up.” and has put renewed focus behind import brands Peroni as “refreshment with Italian
style and sophistication,” and Pilsner Urquell as “the beer
aficionado’s beer.”
Adami also emphasized that he believes beer pricing
wars are damaging to the industry. “Commoditized industries are
usually governed by two laws —whoever is cheapest wins … and
whoever has the scale is cheapest. As the much smaller player, we have
every reason in the world to seek sensible pricing,” he said.
IRI’s Wandel agrees that pricing must be a
priority if the beer industry is to make a true turnaround.
“It’s gotten into this aggressive mode during the past year or
so,” he says. “I know people are fighting for share, but we
need to see the pricing stabilize.”
Coors Brewing Co. is focusing its efforts on its
Rockies image with new packaging and a “Taste the Cold”
tagline. The company will roll out new aluminum bottles with liners to keep
beer colder longer. It also is said to be looking into a longneck bottle
with “outlast technology” that insulates the beer to prevent it
from getting warm in a consumer’s hand. At this spring’s
Nightclub and Bar Show in Las Vegas, the
company displayed Stay-Cold Glassware made from borosilicate glass for the
on-premise market.
Top micro/craft beers by brand | |||||||||
Dollar sales | Market share | ||||||||
Category | Dollar sales | % change vs. prior year | Market share | % change vs. prior year | |||||
Channel: Food, drug and mass merchandise (excluding Wal-Mart) | |||||||||
SIERRA NEVADA PALE ALE | $50,020,848 | 6.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | |||||
SAMUEL ADAMS BOSTON LAGER | $44,540,488 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |||||
SAMUEL ADAMS SEASONAL | $20,961,296 | 10.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | |||||
NEW BELGIUM FAT TIRE AMBER ALE | $19,690,134 | 16.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | |||||
SAMUEL ADAMS LIGHT | $18,813,876 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | |||||
SHINER BOCK | $16,027,015 | 10.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | |||||
WIDMER HEFEWEIZEN | $15,790,137 | 17.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | |||||
REDHOOK ESB | $11,847,951 | (7.7) | 0.1 | (0.0) | |||||
PYRAMID HEFEWEIZEN ALE | $7,526,191 | 15.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | |||||
DESCHUTES MIRROR POND PALE ALE | $7,268,187 | 12.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | |||||
FDM MICRO/CRAFT TOTAL | $428,906,336 | 9.4 | 5.0 | 0.4 | |||||
Channel: Total U.S. Convenience | |||||||||
SIERRA NEVADA PALE ALE | $24,708,220 | 6.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | |||||
SAMUEL ADAMS BOSTON LAGER | $13,355,490 | (14.7) | 0.1 | (0.0) | |||||
SHINER BOCK | $10,096,920 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | |||||
FAT TIRE AMBER ALE | $6,259,764 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
SAMUEL ADAMS SEASONAL | $6,221,169 | 88.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
SAMUEL ADAMS LIGHT | $4,622,336 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
WIDMER HEFEWEIZEN | $4,080,014 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
RED HOOK ESB | $2,372,006 | 8.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
DESCHUTES MIRROR POND PALE ALE | $2,149,510 | 9.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
ALASKAN AMBER | $1,748,677 | 25.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
CONVENIENCE MICRO/CRAFT TOTAL | $132,750,900 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 0.0 | |||||
Source: Information Resources Inc., Chicago; 52 weeks ending Feb. 19, 2006 |
Top flavored malt beverages by brand | |||||||||
Dollar sales | Market share | ||||||||
Category | Dollar sales | % change vs. prior year | Market share | % change vs. prior year | |||||
Channel: Food, drug and mass merchandise (excluding Wal-Mart) | |||||||||
SMIRNOFF ICE | $46,649,972 | (21.3) | 0.5 | (0.1) | |||||
MIKE’S HARD LEMONADE | $35,831,756 | (10.1) | 0.4 | (0.0) | |||||
SMIRNOFF TWISTED V GREEN APPLE | $23,841,922 | (26.5) | 0.3 | (0.1) | |||||
SMIRNOFF ICE TRIPLE BLACK | $20,851,730 | (27.6) | 0.2 | (0.1) | |||||
MIKE’S HARD CRANBERRY LEMONADE | $20,780,966 | (19.9) | 0.2 | (0.1) | |||||
SMIRNOFF TWISTED V RASPBERRY | $20,625,514 | (19.1) | 0.2 | (0.1) | |||||
SMIRNOFF TWISTED V WATERMELON | $16,424,445 | 917.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||
SMIRNOFF TWISTED V BLACK CHERRY | $13,742,637 | 1,249.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |||||
MIKE’S HARD LIME | $13,741,756 | (9.6) | 0.2 | (0.0) | |||||
SMIRNOFF TWISTED V VARIETY PACK | $11,095,015 | 103.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||
FDM MALTERNATIVE/FMB TOTAL | $336,431,264 | (6.1) | 3.9 | (0.3) | |||||
Channel: Total U.S. Convenience | |||||||||
SMIRNOFF ICE | $84,297,620 | (19.0) | 0.7 | (0.2) | |||||
SMIRNOFF TWISTED V GREEN APPLE | $45,584,930 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | |||||
SPARKS | $40,175,080 | 68.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | |||||
SMIRNOFF ICE TRIPLE BLACK | $31,373,920 | (31.5) | 0.2 | (0.1) | |||||
MIKE’S HARD LEMONADE | $29,208,910 | (9.9) | 0.2 | (0.0) | |||||
SMIRNOFF TWISTED V WATERMELON | $23,822,200 | 989.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||
SMIRNOFF TWISTED V RASPBERRY | $21,248,720 | (7.8) | 0.2 | (0.0) | |||||
BACARDI SILVER RAZ | $17,235,330 | (36.3) | 0.1 | (0.1) | |||||
MIKE’S HARD CRANBERRY LEMONADE | $14,467,190 | (20.7) | 0.1 | (0.0) | |||||
BACARDI SILVER O3 | $10,710,090 | (52.0) | 0.1 | (0.1) | |||||
CONVENIENCE MALTERNATIVE/FMB TOTAL | $432,403,100 | (5.6) | 3.4 | (0.3) | |||||
Source: Information Resources Inc., Chicago; 52 weeks ending Feb. 19, 2006 |
IRI’s Wandel points out that a lesser-known
Coors brand, Blue Moon Belgian White, has quietly performed very well for
the company. The brand has enjoyed double-digit growth during the past
three years, and is particularly popular on-premise where it plays up its
coriander and orange peel content by being served with an orange slice.
Leading growth
Craft beers boasted the largest growth of any beer
segment, and according to a recent Citigroup wholesaler survey, beer distributors think the major brewers should
consider adding micros to the mix. Sixty-four percent of wholesalers
surveyed thought the major brewers should add craft beers through
acquisition, but leave the smaller companies to operate independently.
The wholesalers also indicated that within more
traditional offerings, seasonal beers have the best chance at raising the
image of beer with consumers. IRI’s Wandel agrees, saying that
seasonal beers and variety packs were especially popular last year, and
future efforts should include better execution of more niche products at
the retail level.
“There is still a tremendous amount of
opportunity with retailers to better understand segments like the
micro/craft and the import segments,” he says. “I don’t
see those segments getting their fair share of merchandising
activity… so even though micros and imports are growing, if they got
the kind of merchandising support they deserve, they could do even
better.”
Call him an optimist, but Wandel also anticipates
better industry performance across the board. “I do not think the
beer category is dead by any stretch of the imagination,” he says.
“With the innovation going on this year, if pricing stabilizes and if
the high-end continues to do well, I think beer is in line to have a
strong, solid showing.” BI